When you report discrimination at work, it can feel like the people at the top of the corporate ladder are untouchable. A recent federal decision from the District of New Jersey, Dominguez v. Novo Nordisk Inc., shows that senior executives can be held accountable when they allow discrimination or retaliation.…
Articles Posted in Discrimination
Federal Court Allows Flight Attendant’s Disability and Leave Claims to Proceed Against United Airlines
Employees in New Jersey have strong legal protection against workplace discrimination, retaliation, and interference with medical leaves. A recent decision in Naranjo v. United Airlines, Inc. reinforces those rights, particularly for workers managing chronic health conditions. The federal court’s opinion allows a former flight attendant’s disability discrimination and Family and…
New Jersey Court Revives Employee’s Hostile Work Environment Claim
Workers in Bergen County and across New Jersey have the right to a workplace free of harassment. A recent decision from the Appellate Division, Burga v. UniFirst Corp., demonstrates that courts will allow sexual harassment claims to move forward when there is evidence of a hostile work environment and inadequate…
New Protection for Employees From Political Speech by Employers
Today, Governor Murphy signed into law an amendment to a New Jersey employment law that will protect most employees from being forced to listen to their employer’s political or religious opinions. The statute is expressly intended to ensure that workers are permitted to perform their jobs rather than having to…
Federal Court Allows Newark Employee’s Religious Discrimination Claim to Proceed
Workers in Bergen County and throughout New Jersey have the right to practice their faith without sacrificing their jobs. A recent federal decision, Aquil v. City of Newark, underscores that employees have the right not to be subjected to religious discrimination at work. The ruling confirms that, when a worker…
Supreme Court Clarifies Title VII Reverse Discrimination Standard in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services
On June 5, 2025, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, clarifying the legal standards that apply in workplace “reverse discrimination” cases. The Court held that plaintiffs are not subject to a heightened burden when alleging discrimination simply because they…
NJ Court Affirms Jury’s Discrimination Verdict Against Newark Public Schools
In many employment discrimination cases, it can be difficult to prove what really motivated a company’s decision to fire, demote, or pass over a qualified worker for a promotion. But sometimes, someone in power simply says the quiet part out loud—and when that happens, the law is clear. That was…
New Jersey Appellate Court Clarifies NJFLA Protections in Recent Decision
When your employer denies you a leave to care for a loved one, it can feel like you are being forced to choose between your job and your family. Fortunately, New Jersey law provides strong protections for employees under the New Jersey Family Leave Act (NJFLA). However, as a…
DCR Revises Regulation Based on Jonathan Nirenberg’s Suggestion
The New Jersey Division on Civil Rights recently modified its proposed regulation regarding disparate impact claims based on a comment that I submitted earlier this year. On June 3, 2024 the DCR initially proposed the new regulation to addresses disparate impact claims under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”). …
Court Recognizes New Jersey Law Against Discrimination’s Broad Definition of Disability
In a recent unpublished decision, New Jersey’s Appellate Division make it clear that an employee does not have to have a severe or permanent impairment to have a viable disability discrimination to be protected by the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”). The case was filed by Bart Algozzini, who…